ACT: finally standing for something?

The ACT party has never really stood for anything. Even in its early days when Prebble and Douglas were setting the direction, in the public eye it was mostly a vehicle for yelling about tougher prison sentences, lower tax, and less positive discrimination. This inconsistent set of policies turned it into the Big Meanie Party and let the media reduce it to nothing more than a mini-National, but meaner.
Continue reading

Advertisements

Beliefs and politics

Somewhere off in a different part of the internet, I’ve been getting stick for the following comment:

I guess what I’m trying to say is that liberals care about people too. We believe fervently in the power of individual decisions to bring about good outcomes for everyone. We see tremendous potential in human beings – potential that requires little more than freedom to express itself. We’re passionate about empowering people to run their own lives. All of these things are deeply idealistic and even quite beautiful.

Although the guy I’m arguing with is just a troll, his objection to my use of “fervently” gave me pause.

What I’d like to see is a Liberal Economist (just once) elaborate the evidential basis for their “fervent” beliefs. It is my considered observation that “fervent” anything rarely ends well for anyone.

He’s wrong, of course. Continue reading